This blog discusses in detail the representation of SC/ST, infact they are under representing their population as seen in the below table.
Form the second table it is evident that Reservation has helped in the improvement of conditions and their numbers in Govt Services.
In 1959 GROUP A 1.18 % represented, in 2005 about 11.9 %.
Population of SC/ST In India and their representation in
Govt Servcies
In 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding sweepers
|
Total Population
|
Percentage
|
Group A
|
Group B
|
Group C
|
Group D
|
SC
|
16.6
|
11.9
|
13.7
|
16.4
|
18.3
|
ST
|
8.6
|
4.3
|
4.5
|
6.5
|
6.9
|
TOTAL
|
25.2
|
16.2
|
18.2
|
22.9
|
25.2
|
Lagging Behind
|
|
9%
|
7%
|
2.30%
|
0%
|
Class
|
1959
|
1965
|
1974
|
1984
|
1995
|
I
|
1.18
|
1.64
|
3.2
|
6.92
|
10.12
|
II
|
2.38
|
2.82
|
4.6
|
10.36
|
12.67
|
III
|
6.95
|
8.88
|
10.3
|
13.98
|
16.15
|
IV
|
17.24a
|
17.75
|
18.6
|
20.2
|
21.26a
|
Table
1: Representation of Lower Castes in Central Government Services [All numbers in %]
Source: Report of the Backward Classes (Mandal) Commission, 1980, Vol II, p.92. Also available at
Source: Report of the Backward Classes (Mandal) Commission, 1980, Vol II, p.92. Also available at
http://idsn.org/news-resources/idsn-news/read/article/two-thirds-of-indias-dalits-are-poor/128/
Poverty levels are highest among India’s tribal population
(81.4 percent), followed by Dalits (65.8 percent) and Other Backward Classes
(58.3 percent). The poverty level among the rest of the population is 33.3
percent.
http://idsn.org/news-resources/idsn-news/read/article/two-thirds-of-indias-dalits-are-poor/128/
|
||||||
Typical comparison of Upper caste Bramhins Vs SC/ST [ The data is
collected form the above link, the bramhin data is published in an article in
outlookindia]
|
||||||
Caste
|
Total population in crores ~data
|
poor
|
Rich
|
Literacy levels
|
Graduates
|
|
SC/St in2007, basically 26% of 113crores
|
30
|
75%
|
|
(2001)54.69/ 47.10%
|
NA
|
|
Brahmins as in 2007
|
5.6
|
13%
|
19%
|
84%
|
39%
|
as on 1.1.2011, the representation of SC and ST in Group C
is 16.4% and 7.7%, respectively. Similarly, in erstwhile Group D as on
1.1.2009, the representation of SC and ST was 21.6% and 6.7%, respectively,
which as on 1.1.2011 has gone upto 23% and 6.8%, respectively
GROUP C as on 1.1.2011
|
16.4%
|
7.7%
|
GROUP D as on 1.1.2011
|
23%
|
6.7%
|
As per the annual publication
“Statistics of Higher and Technical Education” of Ministry of Human Resource
Development, the number of teachers in higher education in the country during
2009-10(Provisional) is 652665. As per the provisional report on the All India
Survey on Higher Education, the percentages of SC and ST teaching and
non-teaching staff out of their total number during 2010-11 (Provisional) based
on data collected up to 31st July, 2012 are given below:
SC
|
ST
|
|
Teaching Staff
|
7.4
|
2.9
|
Non -Teaching Staff
|
12.2
|
4.0
|
September 5, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=-qfAyDVogxc&feature=player_ embedded
He summarises caste system and economic policies etc.. are the deep routed problems. Corruption is just the tip of the iceberg This man Sainath he has journeyed 10k + kms into rural areas, he is an authority on rural India and its issues.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
He summarises caste system and economic policies etc.. are the deep routed problems. Corruption is just the tip of the iceberg This man Sainath he has journeyed 10k + kms into rural areas, he is an authority on rural India and its issues.
Quantifying untouchability, the study revealed that the
denial of entry to Dalits into ‘upper caste’ homes was a “strictly observed
practice” with 82 per cent of the households saying they were not allowed into
these homes.
Sixty-four out of 100 households said they were denied entry to
temples (here, an overwhelming majority said they could not enter the sanctum
sanctorum of the temple, notes the study), while 22 per cent were not allowed
to go near common water sources in the villages.
If we were to look at specific groups or communities, this would
be even clearer. Let alone on the hunger index, India's rank in the U.N.'s
Human Development Index is anyway dismal. There, at 126, we are below Bolivia,
Guatemala and Gabon. Yet even that rank does not tell the full story. If we
were to isolate the rich and the better off as a group, they might enter the
top 10 nations. Efforts last year to look at adivasis as a group led pretty
much in the reverse direction. One study found that if we were to derive the
HDI for our tribes only, they would rank in the worst off 25 nations of the
world.
http://www.indiatogether.org/ 2007/nov/psa-index.htm
http://www.indiatogether.org/