1 Ideology:
1.1 Ideological Polarization:
2 Modi Hires American Lobbying:
3 SCAMs in MODI Government
3.1 ESSAR SCAM:
3.2 ADANI SCAM:
3.3 GAS BLOCK SCAM:
4 SIT CLAIM DENT on MODI
5 SIT ADVOCATE SAYS NOT A TOTAL CLEAN CHIT:
6 HIS TAINTED AIDS
7. RSS BACKED MODI :
8 ANTI DALIT/ANTI POOR
8.1 In Modi’s Gujarat, no Narmada water for dalits
8.2 NO JOBS TO DALITS
8.3 MODI calls DALIT MENTALLY RETARDED
9 Caste based water distributed system, worst that can be seen
10 ANTI POOR and ANIT MUSLIM
1: Ideology
A RSS fundamentalist and a communal:
1.1 Ideological Polarization:
You move to any government office in
Gujarat and the change is visible. You have Sardar Patel all over. Gandhi is
relegated to a poor second position.
2 Modi Hires American Lobbying:
MODI SPENDS 500 crore +
How an American lobbying company
Apco Worldwide markets Narendra Modi to the world
3 SCAMs in MODI Government
3.1 ESSAR SCAM:
3.2 ADANI SCAM:
The Modi government gave 14,306
acres of land to Adani at the rate of Rs 1 per square meter, where as market
rate was Rs 300 per square meter. Kejriwal targets Modi over Gujarat gas deal,
seeks probe
3.3 GAS BLOCK SCAM:
4 SIT CLAIM DENT on MODI
The real story emerges in a series
of desperate wireless messages sent out by police and intelligence field staff
positioned at the Sola Civil Hospital and other locations on February 27 and
28, 2002. The wireless extracts, annexed to a protest petition filed against
the SIT’s closure report by Ms. Jafri in a local court, show the following.
5 SIT ADVOCATE SAYS NOT A TOTAL CLEAN CHIT:
However, the SIT's advocate, R.S.
Jamvuar, hinted that it was not a “total clean chit” given to all those named
in Ms. Jafri's complaint. “I can't say it is a clean chit. But, there are a lot
of points in the report, based on which a lot of departmental inquiries can be
initiated against those who are accused in the case,” he said, asked about the
details of the SIT report in respect of Mr. Modi and others.
The Ode probe, also conducted by the
SIT, achieved this, despite many prosecution witnesses turning hostile, he
said. The fact that the fast track court also accepted the “criminal conspiracy
theory” against the accused showed the “quality of investigation.”
6 HIS TAINTED AIDES
AMITH SHAH MODI's CLOSE AIDE is on
BAIL
The Supreme Court has directed that
while his bail is under challenge, he is not permitted to enter his home state
of Gujarat where he may influence the investigations as he was the Home
Minister during the encounter killing. "The CBI has also been arguing
before the Supreme Court that the Tulsi Prajapati murder was also ordered by
Shah and that the case should be transferred out of Gujarat where it may be
subject to interference.[23]
In contrast to the Court order for
Amit Shah to remain outside Gujarat, he surprisingly attended cricket match
between India-Pakistan on Dec 28, 2012 in Ahmadabad alongside Narendra Modi. He
was also part of the presentation ceremony at the end of the match."
7. RSS BACKED MODI :
Modi has been placed miles ahead of
other BJP leaders by the party's parent organisation, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak
Sangh, in the year before the scheduled general election of 2014.
In spite of BJP veteran L K Advani's
[ Images ] resistance, the RSS is backing Modi in the larger interest of the
saffron brotherhood, the Sangh Parivar.
8 ANTI DALIT/ANTI POOR
8.1 In Modi’s Gujarat, no Narmada water for dalits
8.2 NO JOBS TO DALITS
There is growing backlog of posts
reserved for dalits in the state government. Instead of filling these posts,
efforts are being made to cancel them, claimed Gohil.
According to Gohil, records of the
last five years showed that budgetary provisions for dalit-centric projects
remained unused.Commercialisation of education also has created a situation
where dalits cannot afford education which is dominated by self-financed
institutions.
8.3 MODI calls DALIT MENTALLY RETARDED
On 25 April 2010 Narendra Modi is
reported to have observed while releasing his book Samajik Samrasata that
Dalits were like mentally retarded children.
9
In this village, discrimination is literally written on the wallThe writing says Rajputs and Patels will get water from 8 am to 10 am. Then, from 10 am to 12 noon, it is the turn of the Bharwads and Vaghris and lastly, Harijans and other untouchables for the next two hours.
The Sarpanch also accepted that they put up the notice on the wall to streamline the distribution of water as the village has different water distribution lines according to castes residing in the areas.
10 ANTI POOR and ANIT MUSLIM
There are plenty of indicators to
prove that Gujarat under Modi has no place for minorities. Several recent
reports and analyses show that the Muslims of Gujarat are among the poorest and
most discriminated against community in the country. Additionally, the
employment of tactics such as amending laws to suppress the community
establishes Modi’s agenda.
We found that in 95% of the cases
there is acquittal due to negligence and hostile role of government pleaders.
In most of the remaining 5% cases the accused are punished under provisions of
the Indian Penal Code and are acquitted under the SC/ST Prevention of
Atrocities Act. In many cases severe strictures are passed by courts and
directions are issued for action against erring officials for negligence in
cases of atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis, but instead of taking any action
against them they are rewarded with promotions.
We made several representations to
the Gujarat government in this regard but no action has been taken. The
government has not filled up the numerous posts for Dalits that are still lying
vacant. Even in the SC Welfare Department of the Gujarat government, which is
meant to be the apex government department working for Dalits, there are many
such vacant posts. For instance, the Department has been sanctioned 23 PSI
class III officers, but only 2 posts have been filled up. While there are meant
to be 185 Inspector Class III officers there are only 83. In the Junior
inspector Class III grade there are supposed to be 40 posts but only 17 have
been filled up.
There is a more basic point to be
made that involves understanding how our Westminster parliamentary democracy
works. Asking whether respondents support one or another individual for PM may
be of interest, but there is no guarantee that people will actually vote on
that basis.
In our model, unlike a presidential
system, voters elect members of Parliament, and the national election is an
aggregation of individual contests across constituencies.
